Saturday, February 18, 2006


Freedom of the press has been a staple of American culture since the initiation of the Constitutional Amendments — the First Amendment to be specific. Many nations have followed suit and we observe this sacrosanct "right" with pride and, sometimes, with caution.

Since the flames of political and religious fervor seem to be dying down somewhat, I’m feeling I can now write about a recent subject that plowed the First Amendment into the limelight. I’m speaking about the cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed which depicted him wearing a bomb-shaped turban. This illustration was the brainchild (brainfart?) of a Danish newspaper and first appeared in September 2005. The unrest that ensued caused deaths, bombings, financial crisis’ and a slew of other terrible events.

If you think I’m going to make some political commentary on this subject, think again. There’s been enough of that already. Plus I’m not claiming to be bright enough (or stupid enough) to make a statement that’ll somehow calm peoples nerves and settle this matter once and for all. There’s just too many variables to take into consideration. My father used to tell me that "opinions are like assholes, everyone has one." Since I also have both, I’m going to restrict one to prevent my becoming the other. But what I will do here is blog briefly about the effects literature has on the world at large and how they relate to the recent cartoon crisis.

Although cartoons may not necessarily fall into the realm of literature, you do have to observe and/or read them to "get" what they mean. I love reading Doonesbury because the cartoon panels are socially/politically relevant and, even if I don’t agree with what Garry Trudeau has to say in them, it always gets me to grin or cringe. Much of what Doonesbury covers relates back to the age of the hippy, too — question authority, stand up for your rights, don’t let "the man" push you around.

Newspapers are how a large percentage of the world’s population gets their information. So it shouldn’t be surprising when an article (or a cartoon) unleashes widespread change, discussion, or anger. During the U.S. Nixon administration, we all remember what happened when Woodward and Bernstein uncovered the Watergate debacle and published it in The Washington Post. Now that truly shows the power of the press and how the first amendment allowed these men to bring out the truth.

Films are becoming important in the world, too, and like cartoons they are a visual (and auditory) means of conveying a message and can have a huge impact on literature. For instance, the movie CAPOTE has brought out a readership resurgence for the book IN COLD BLOOD. THE CHRONICLES OF NARNIA film has caused the old tomes to reach the bestseller lists again. And I have no doubt that the Ron Howard film THE DA VINCI CODE will make that book hit the #1 spot on many bestseller lists again. Of course, these films compete with such crap as BIG MOMMA’S HOUSE and THE CAVE — going to the theaters is sometimes risky to your intellect, so be careful.

I think we sometimes forget how lucky we are to live in a place (I’m speaking of the U.S.) where freedoms are actual "rights" and are written down in documents for all to see. Many countries don’t have this and the rights change with the political climate.

We have to "put up with" these rights, too, even if we don’t always agree with what they cover (i.e., pornography, liberalism versus conservatism, etc.).

So the next time you see an article, a cartoon, or a commentary on something that rankles your hide, remember that at least you live in a country where you have the right to see it, and that right is protected by law. And, of course, you also have the right to rebuke it. So shoot off a letter to the editor if you feel like it.

It’s your right.

Thursday, February 02, 2006


As we move further into the 21st century, technology has made it easier and easier for us to communicate. Cell phones, palm pilots, treos, and, of course, e-mail are household names now, and I’d like to focus on one of these that may not necessarily aid us in our quest to understand one another ...


I recently had an e-mail correspondence with someone over a fairly simple subject—punctuation—and our tempers flared.


Are commas, semicolons, and capitalizations really that important? For writers (like me and the person I e-mailed), it is. But this subject usually isn’t something requiring blood pressure medication. The fault, I found, lay partially with me, partially with the other person, and definitely with the method of communication we were using: e-mail.

Much is lost in e-mail correspondences versus phone or in-person contact. Let me give you an example: "I liked the way your hair looked the other day." How many different ways can this be interpreted? Is the writer being honest? Sarcastic? Funny? Spiteful? It’s tough to say without knowing, in context, why exactly the e-mailer is writing about her hair, but you get the general idea.

So if an e-mail reddens your face and causes profanities to burst forth from your normally tepid mouth, pick up the phone and call the person ...or meet up with them for drinks. You and your blood pressure will be thankful. Trust me.

Coffee anyone?